Another Unbelievable Connection

Who is Lisa Barsoomian and why does it matter?

She’s a Georgetown Law graduate and a protege of James Comey and Robert Mueller. According to

with her boss R Craig Lawrence represented Bill Clinton in 1998 Lawrence also represented

Robert Muller three times

James Comey five times

Barack Obama 45 times

Kathleen Sebelius 56 times

Bill Clinton 40 times and

Hillary Clinton 17 times

between 1998 and 2017

Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times

You may be saying to yourself, okay who cares, who cares about the work history of this Barsoomian woman.

Apparently someone does.

Someone out there cares so much that they’ve purged all Barsoomian court documents for her Clinton representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the DC District and Appeals court dockets.

Someone out there cares so much that the internet has been purged of all information pertaining to Barsoomian.

Historically this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative.

Additionally Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community.

Why does Barsoomian, CIA operative, merit any mention?


She is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE

That’s why.

Barsoomian’s loyalties are tainted.

How could this not have influenced Rosenstein?

This clearly violates the appearance of impropriety attorney’s rules?

Both owe their careers as US attorneys to Muller, Obama, Bush, and the Clintons.

Impartiality? that’s impossible.

Rod Rosenstein has no business involving himself in the Hillary Clinton-DNC funded Steel dossier, and the ongoing Russia investigation.

Much less the selection of his mentor and his wife’s mentor Robert Muller as Special Counsel.

Blatant Bias at 5

At noon I decided to turn to Channel 5 to get the weather.

For the most part, I refrain from watching local newscasts because they are only crime stories and bad weather prognostications. They live in a republic of fear at 5, a place I do not choose to visit.

But I did visit and immediately regretted it.

Up popped a story, from CNN, as it turns out, about Larry Kudlow joining Trump’s economic team. But 5’s Kym Clark introduced it by saying, “It’s a presidency that was essentially born on reality TV and now the lines between TV and reality are blurring even further.”

What? It’s a presidency born of hard work, a lifetime of achievements and a knowledge of the American people’s feelings not understood by his opponent. Trump was on an NBC show no less. Does that mean we should stop watching their stuff, if this is the outcome? Is that the implication? As for blurring even further, I think the Trump voter understands reality and the fake media much better than anyone in that business. Talk about editorializing!

“Donald Trump has chosen a cable news personality to be his top economic advisor. But Larry Kudlow (she mispronounced his name) certainly isn’t the only wire running straight from the TV to the White House.”

Kudlow had a show on CNBC, a sister network, but before that worked in the White House under Reagan, wrote several books about the economy and has his own financial firm. He’s in touch with the big people in the finance industry. Besides, he was never a “celebrity.” I doubt 2% of people would recognize him if he knocked on their door. Sad that they have to scuttle all his years of work to dwell on his relatively short TV career. But that’s how awful the media has become.

The CNN story went on to quote David Rothkopf as decrying the choice, tweeting “Fake experts for fake advisory roles. Trumptopia.” Who the hell is David Rothkopf and who cares?

She went on to criticize former Fox anchor Heather Nauert for becoming No. 4 at the State Department. She appears to have done well there. Why shouldn’t she be promoted? Oh, that’s right, I forgot. Only Deep State people are allowed to rise. And their sexism is showing.

Then she said, “another Fox personality could be joining the Trump administration. Pete Hedgespeth is currently being considered to run the sprawling department of Veterans affairs, that employs just over 400,000 people.” “Could be?” Is that the journalistic standard for reporting? Speculation outweighs facts?

And how horrible is it that a recent veteran might take over to help a veterans’ administration often staffed by people who were never in the military? Remember Obama’s choice for VA Secretary, Robert McDonald? He was a retired CEO of Procter & Gamble. A veteran who understands veterans’ needs surely can’t be considered.

“President Trump doesn’t just hire media types, he consults them, too. He dined recently with Fox News personalities Jesse Waters and Geraldo Rivera reportedly gossiping about TV and politics.” Note the “reportedly.” How does she know he was consulting with them? She has no idea what they talked about. Why shouldn’t he dine with whomever he wants? Barack Obama was interviewed by GloZell, the youtube “star” who broadcast from a bathtub filled with cereal and milk, eating out of it.

Don’t forget Zach Galifianakis, on his Youtube show, Between Two Ferns where they discussed his pardoning of the turkeys, among other inanities. Now that’s journalism!

But the CNN reporter went on to slam Kimberly Guilfoyle and Sean Hannity, who seems to have made the decision on the Iran nuclear deal and the release of the GOP memo alleging corruption and anti Trump bias by FBI members.

She pompously ended it with, “presidential advisors in the age of Trump. Randy Kay, CNN.”

Clark couldn’t be upstaged, so she then said, rolling her eyes, “President Trump may or may not make another change in his White House circle soon. Sources told CNN Trump is ready to replace National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster. No announcement was made to allow McMaster to nail down his next step.”

I see Channel 5 does not keep up with the news, because that was debunked this morning. In fact, it appears that was a test to see who is leaking at the White House. Sarah Sanders denied it yesterday and last night, but NBC must not keep up – or want to.

What do you want to bet that if a Democrat president (God help us) tapped people at CNN, they would jump on board without blinking. Would they be criticized then?

You know the answer.

New GOP Must Prevail

The race in Pennsylvania has not yet been called. With only a 579 vote difference, they must count the military and absentee ballots to see who wins.

However, the message from this election as I see it, is that the Trump GOP candidates can win; the RINO/normal GOPers cannot.

If you doubt this, look at the Alabama Senate race. Had Trump backed Luther won the primary, he probably would have won the race.

In the Pennsylvania race, the Democrat Lamb cloaked himself in Trump GOP messages. He is a Marine. He said he’d work with the opposition. He said he’d back tax cuts and that he’s pro life. The naive Pennsylvani electorate believed him. He’s really a wolf in lamb’s clothing and will follow whatever Pelosi tells him to do.

Saccone got a big bump from Trump’s stumping for him. Before Trump came, Saccone was trailing. Too bad he didn’t take a cue from the president and become more vocal. He disowned unions, which seems like the main reason he didn’t win. Trump made it easy in this steel country, after he put tariffs on foreign steel. Saccone should have run with that. His predecessor, Republican Tim Murphy, did back the unions.

Lamb got a lot of outside money, too. Somehow the broke DNC always manages to scrape together enough to push their vile candidates. Does anyone else smell Soros?

Now we’ll be subjected to media insisting there is a blue wave coming in November. It will also energize the Dems to get their people out.

Anyone we put up must be free of sexual scandals and deeply vetted. That hurt us in the House in 2006 when we lost our majority after the Florida GOP congressmen had been outed for his attraction to House pages. The Dems know this tactic well and it always works for them. They have the media ready with their megaphones to help them.

Maybe Trump should fire Ronna Romney McDaniels. I’m not sure she is tough enough for the job. Fortunately, saying “you’re fired” is an easy call for the president.

This is going to be a very tough summer because the campaign slurs will be fast and furious coming our way. We must act offensively and shut the Dems down. Too much is at stake.

This Is What It’s Come to

If you don’t know who Jamie Oliver is, don’t feel bad.
He’s a British chef and cookbook author who has been on a mission to shove healthy food down our throats and his cookbook is full of expensive ingredients that are difficult to find. His recipes are also not user friendly.

Anyhow, he is a Trump hater.

A serious one.

Here’s how deep his TDS goes:

Celebrity chef Jamie Oliver has been on something of a mission throughout the last decade, to educate people on healthy eating habits.

Does this good will, however, extend to President Donald Trump? You may remember, according to Corey Lewandowski, Trump’s favorite meal is a 2,400 calorie McDonald’s stomach bomb, chased down with a milkshake.

Maybe. Maybe not.

Oliver recently sat down with British talk show host Russell Howard and said he is trying to avoid America altogether during the Trump years and would not likely be cooking for him anytime soon.

“I’m kind of hoping that I don’t have to go to America while he’s [Trump] in power,” he said. “I don’t know if I can hold it out but I’m going to try.”

What would happen if the celebrity chef found himself in a situation where he was forced to cook for the sitting president? Would he phone it in? Nope.

He would, however, play something of a practical joke on Trump, plying him with stool-loosening foods, as an attempt to make him soil his pants, or something.

“I think I would bite the bullet, I think I’d be professional and I think I’d cook with all of my heart and my soul,” he said. “I’d just use all of my training as a nutritionist to cook things that really make your asshole loose.”

So, there you go, if Oliver ever cooks for Trump, prepare for some stories about the president spending some serious time in the bathroom.

This is from Mediaite.

Nice, eh?

Alarming Development

We know that Democrat strategists plan on using stealth candidates to undermine Republicans in the Congressional midterms.

Already we have heard of people in the military who are running as Democrats. They obviously hope to persuade voters that they are patriotic people who believe in freedom and liberty. Some will even try to promote that they agree with Trump on some things, just to steal votes.

I had not heard until the article below, that the Dems are also planning on using ex CIA people as candidates.

It makes sense because the Deep state must protect itself and who better to do so than Deep State people? Not only can they cover for their people, but they can also promote Trump’s impeachment.

Here are the details, from World Socialist website:

An extraordinary number of former intelligence and military operatives from the CIA, Pentagon, National Security Council and State Department are seeking nomination as Democratic candidates for Congress in the 2018 midterm elections. The potential influx of military-intelligence personnel into the legislature has no precedent in US political history.

If the Democrats capture a majority in the House of Representatives on November 6, as widely predicted, candidates drawn from the military-intelligence apparatus will comprise as many as half of the new Democratic members of Congress. They will hold the balance of power in the lower chamber of Congress.

Both push and pull are at work here. Democratic Party leaders are actively recruiting candidates with a military or intelligence background for competitive seats where there is the best chance of ousting an incumbent Republican or filling a vacancy, frequently clearing the field for a favored “star” recruit.

A case in point is Elissa Slotkin, a former CIA operative with three tours in Iraq, who worked as Iraq director for the National Security Council in the Obama White House and as a top aide to John Negroponte, the first director of national intelligence. After her deep involvement in US war crimes in Iraq, Slotkin moved to the Pentagon, where, as a principal deputy assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs, her areas of responsibility included drone warfare, “homeland defense” and cyber warfare.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) has designated Slotkin as one of its top candidates, part of the so-called “Red to Blue” program targeting the most vulnerable Republican-held seats—in this case, the Eighth Congressional District of Michigan, which includes Lansing and Brighton. The House seat for the district is now held by two-term Republican Representative Mike Bishop.

The Democratic leaders are promoting CIA agents and Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. At the same time, such people are choosing the Democratic Party as their preferred political vehicle. There are far more former spies and soldiers seeking the nomination of the Democratic Party than of the Republican Party. There are so many that there is a subset of Democratic primary campaigns that, with a nod to Mad magazine, one might call “spy vs. spy.”

The 23rd Congressional District in Texas, which includes a vast swathe of the US-Mexico border along the Rio Grande, features a contest for the Democratic nomination between Gina Ortiz Jones, an Air Force intelligence officer in Iraq, who subsequently served as an adviser for US interventions in South Sudan and Libya, and Jay Hulings. The latter’s website describes him as a former national security aide on Capitol Hill and federal prosecutor, whose father and mother were both career undercover CIA agents. The incumbent Republican congressman, Will Hurd, is himself a former CIA agent, so any voter in that district will have his or her choice of intelligence agency loyalists in both the Democratic primary and the general election.

CNN’s “State of the Union” program on March 4 included a profile of Jones as one of many female candidates seeking nomination as a Democrat in Tuesday’s primary in Texas. The network described her discreetly as a “career civil servant.” However, the Jones for Congress website positively shouts about her role as a spy, noting that after graduating from college, “Gina entered the US Air Force as an intelligence officer, where she deployed to Iraq and served under the US military’s ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy” (the last phrase signaling to those interested in such matters that Jones is gay).

According to her campaign biography, Ortiz Jones was subsequently detailed to a position as “senior advisor for trade enforcement,” a post President Obama created by executive order in 2012. She would later be invited to serve as a director for investment at the Office of the US Trade Representative, where she led the portfolio that reviewed foreign investments to ensure they did not pose national security risks. With that background, if she fails to win election, she can surely enlist in the trade war efforts of the Trump administration.

Scary, eh?

A Stormy Night

Tonight 60 Minutes is advertising an interview with Stormy Daniels. She’s the babe who says she had an affair with Trump in 2006.
The media is trying to ramp this up into some sort of scandal. Do I know if it’s true? Do I care?
I just hope The Oprah is not the one to interview her.

What does the American public think?
Here are some salient comments:

“I said on Twitter that nobody who didn´t bat an eye at Bill Clinton´s dalliances with an intern IN the White House, no less, has any right t tell me to e upset very this.

“As I said often in the campaign, a) we´re not electing a pastor, and 2) when somebody´s pulling you out of a burning building, you don´t ask them whether they´re a church member in good standing.”



“Actually, I think a better answer from Ms. Huckabee Sanders is to look them in the eye and simply say: ‘People who live in glass houses should not throw stones.’ And when they persist, then say ‘The president has given out more details than Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Anthony Weiner and Eliot Spitzer combined. That´s it. We´re done.'”


“If it even happened it was years ago in his private life. He did not do it as president in the Oval Office and did not lie about it under oath before a grand jury or get his secretary to lie about it for him. End of story.”


This Is the NY Times

Ponder this:

Former NYT editor Jill Abramson probably reflects the paper’s Upper West Side of Manhattan when she reveals she carries as an amulet (against the reality of a Trump presidency) – a little Obama doll in her purse – to comfort herself. “It’s easy to look at what’s happening in Washington, DC, and despair. That’s why I carry a little plastic Obama doll in my purse. I pull him out every now and then to remind myself that the United States had a progressive, African-American president until very recently. Some people find this strange, but you have to take comfort where you can find it in Donald Trump’s America.”