Although liberal cable network hosts are crowing about 2 million new signups for Obamacare, the ACA continues to have big, systemic problems.
Robert Charette writes in IEEE Spectrum that Healthcare.gov is still operating without a safety net.
We start off the 2014 Risk Factor edition of IT Hiccups with yet another wrinkle in the 2013 IT horror story of the year—namely the chaotic implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) website and supporting back-office systems. I didn’t think I could be surprised by any more news about how unprofessional the Healthcare.gov implementation has been, but I must admit that the Wall Street Journal story last Friday reporting that the site was operating without a back-up system in place still managed to startle me. Not to worry, though. Officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), which manages the website, reassured the WSJ that “redundancy is a critical part of our planning.” In other words, they’ll get around to it, eventually. Talk about living dangerously.
Also disclosed on the CMS Healthcare.gov planning “to do list” is the capability to go on line and make basic changes to health insurance coverage, like adding a new child, reporting a marriage, divorce or death, or other “change in circumstance” events. That capability was supposed to be there from the day the system went live in October, but it was postponed amid the flurry of fixes meant to provide even more basic website functionality, like not crashing. Whether the ability to change one’s insurance status will be available by mid-January, right along with other promised ACA back-office functions such as making payments to insurers for the coverage they are offering, remains to be seen. Few outside of CMS hold out much hope that deadline will be met, however; the agency is currently scrambling to get the tens of thousands of individuals who thought they had signed up for health insurance or Medicaid, but don’t actually have coverage because of Healthcare.gov system issues, to sign up again.
Several states also report continued difficulties with their ACA system implementations. Oregon’s implementation is probably in the worst shape, but Maryland’s, Massachusetts’, Minnesota’s, and Vermont’s aren’t that much better. The latter two states have decided to follow Oregon’s lead and withhold money from the prime contractors responsible for the botched IT implementations until the systems are fixed. Oregon is withholding US $20 million from Oracle, while Massachusetts and Vermont are withholding some $58 million and $6 million, respectively, from CGI. CGI, you may recall, is the prime contractor for the mismanaged Healthcare.gov implementation.
Florida has also decided to withhold funds from its IT vendor, Deloitte Consulting, but in this case, for mishandling the implementation of the state’s new $63 million unemployment insurance system which was rolled out in October. Florida says that Deloitte has failed to meet its contractual obligations, which Deloitte vehemently denies. Florida officials have hit Deloitte with penalties of $15 000 a day since 23 December 2013 (which is in addition to $3 million in payments already being withheld, a separate $1.5 million penalty imposed last month, and a $4.5 million penalty imposed on Deloitte by the state in 2012). If things keep going, Deloitte will end up paying Florida for the privilege of building the unemployment system.
It’s still a mess and it doesn’t look like it will get straightened out any time soon, no matter what the rose colored glasses wearing Obamaites claim.