State Senator Brian Kelsey is asking Tennesseans for their opinion on Governor Haslam’s desire to expand Medicaid in our state.
From Tennessee.gov comes the argument for:
Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam today unveiled his Insure Tennessee plan, a two year pilot program to provide health care coverage to Tennesseans who currently don’t have access to health insurance or have limited options. The program rewards healthy behaviors, prepares members to transition to private coverage, promotes personal responsibility and incentivizes choosing preventative and routine care instead of unnecessary use of emergency rooms.
The governor announced that he plans to call a special session to focus on the proposal after the 109th General Assembly convenes in January.
Five key areas of the governor’s plan include:
Fiscally Sound and Sustainable Program
The program will not create any new taxes for Tennesseans and will not add any state cost to the budget. The Tennessee Hospital Association has committed that the industry will cover any additional cost to the state. The program will automatically terminate in the event that either federal funding or support from the hospitals is modified in any way.
New Private Market Choices for Tennesseans
Insure Tennessee offers several options of coverage for individuals below 138 percent of poverty ($16,100 for an individual and $27,300 for a family of three). Tennesseans 21 to 64 years old will be offered a choice of the Healthy Incentives Plan or the Volunteer Plan.
The Volunteer Plan would provide a health insurance voucher to participants that would be used to participate in their employer’s health insurance plan. The voucher, valued at slightly less than the average TennCare per-enrollee cost, can be used to pay for premiums and other out-of-pocket expenses associated with participation in an individual’s employer sponsored private market plan.
Participants in the Healthy Incentives Plan may choose to receive coverage through a redesigned component of the TennCare program, which would introduce Healthy Incentives for Tennesseans (HIT) accounts, modeled after Health Reimbursement Accounts (HRAs), which can be used to pay for a portion of required member cost-sharing.
Payment Reform Efforts
The governor’s Delivery System Reform Initiative lays the foundation for reform by addressing the underlying quality and outcome deficiencies that contribute to growing health care costs and unaffordable insurance coverage. This initiative creates financial incentives for providers to provide high quality care in an efficient and appropriate manner so as to reduce costs and improve health outcomes. Insure Tennessee builds on this reform initiative by creating new participant incentives that align with the existing provider incentives. Ultimately, bringing the health care consumer into the equation is critical to successfully controlling cost growth.
Personal Responsibility and Patient Engagement
The voucher program provides a fixed contribution that can be applied to the costs of a person’s private market plan. All costs incurred in excess of the amount of the voucher are the responsibility of the participant. This structure empowers individuals to make a choice about which plan is better for their needs and to manage their health care expenses to avoid additional costs.
Newly eligible individuals who choose to participate in the TennCare program and whose incomes are above 100 percent of poverty will be required to pay premiums and copays for services. All enrollees, including those with incomes below poverty, will have modest pharmacy copays. TennCare members “earn” contributions into their HIT accounts by performing healthy behaviors. The account then can be used to cover copayment expenses.
Prepares Participants for Commercial Health Coverage
The design of Insure Tennessee is based on private market principles that provide incentives to participants to engage in their health care by actively managing their health care costs. Through both programs, Insure Tennessee introduces a commercial health insurance experience which can help Tennesseans prepare for independence from public assistance.
In June 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could not mandate that states expand their Medicaid programs under the Affordable Care Act. In March 2013, Haslam announced that Tennessee would not expand the traditional Medicaid program but that he would work with the federal government on a plan for Tennessee that would take into consideration program cost, patient engagement, payment reform and health outcomes. Since that time, he has kept those principles as priorities in working toward the Insure Tennessee plan. Haslam has received verbal approval from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on the plan. The next steps are for the state to submit a waiver to HHS and for the governor to take the proposal to the legislature for consideration.
And here’s the opposing point of view from Forbes magazine:
By Jonathan Ingram, Nic Horton and Josh Archambault— Mr. Ingram is Research Director, Mr. Horton is a Policy Impact Specialist, and Mr. Archambault a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Government Accountability.
Governor Bill Haslam (R-TN) recently announced he struck a backroom deal with the Obama administration to expand Obamacare in Tennessee. The governor has no legal authority to expand Medicaid eligibility on his own, which means the state legislature will decide if Obamacare Medicaid expansion will happen.
Haslam touts his “verbal agreement” with the Obama administration as a “market-based Tennessee solution.” The truth is his new “Insure Tennessee” plan is heavy on buzzwords and light on substance. Many of the most important details haven’t been released, as the plan hasn’t even been fully designed. But one thing is clear: like all Obamacare expansions, Haslam’s would be a disaster for Tennessee’s taxpayers and most vulnerable patients.
At the announcement, the governor’s “plan” took the form of a press release and Power Point slideshow. As a result, several important details of Gov. Haslam’s Obamacare expansion plan remain unknown to the public and policymakers. The state hasn’t released a draft waiver application, a concept paper, a list of federal requirements he wants waived, budget neutrality calculations or a working draft of the federal terms and conditions of the expansion. In other words, he hasn’t released an actual “plan” at all.
The few details provided are nothing to be excited about. His plan expands Medicaid to cover able-bodied adults as envisioned by Obamacare. The vast majority of those adults would get coverage through the state’s existing TennCare (Medicaid) program, although some would have the opportunity to use a taxpayer-funded subsidy to pay the cost of employer-sponsored coverage.
Individuals below the poverty line would pay nothing other than nominal copays for prescription drugs. Those adults above the poverty line would pay small copays for some services, which are set at the same nominal levels allowed under traditional Medicaid. In fact, the cost sharing proposed under Insure Tennessee is actually lower than what federal Medicaid rules allow. In other words, it looks and feels just like old Medicaid.
And while Haslam wants $20 monthly “premiums” for adults above the poverty line, this would operate as a mere suggestion, given the fact that there is no meaningful penalty for refusing to pay the bill. Should Washington allow the state to disenroll people who do not pay their premiums, the absence of a lock-out penalty means they can immediately re-enroll, turning the “requirement” into a suggestion.
Haslam’s plan also includes a benefits account for engaging in certain healthy behaviors. Again, the details are thin at this point, but there’s nothing innovative there. Managed care organizations, including those serving TennCare patients, have been offering these types of benefits accounts for years.
Haslam did make one good decision, however. After more than a year of reviewing Arkansas’ failed “Private Option” Obamacare expansion experiment, he rejected taking Tennessee down the same path. His Medicaid director explained that simple “math” convinced the Haslam administration that the Arkansas expansion approach is too costly to work. Yet Gov. Haslam apparently ignored the most important lesson from Arkansas’ boondoggle: no matter how much you dress up a Medicaid expansion plan, it is still just more Obamacare in disguise.
Marketing gimmicks, no matter how slick they appear on a Power Point slide, cannot change facts. Despite the buzzwords, the plan is, to its core, an Obamacare expansion. It covers the exact same able-bodied, working-age adults Obamacare prioritizes. It is subject to the same cost-sharing limits as traditional Medicaid and utilizes the same existing Medicaid system to deliver the same Medicaid benefits for most enrollees. The plan would operate under a Medicaid waiver, require an amended Medicaid state plan to implement and would be funded through the Medicaid program. Everything Obamacare always wanted.
A previous Medicaid expansion nearly bankrupted the state after the disastrous TennCare expansion of the 1990s.
Tennessee expanded Medicaid eligibility to a new class of able-bodied childless adults in 1994, just like Haslam wants to do today under Obamacare. In the decade following, the state’s Medicaid costs more than tripled, growing faster than any other state in the region and much faster than revenue. Enrollment soared and expansion costs were well over projections.
By the mid-2000s, Medicaid was devouring nearly 36 percent of the entire state budget. Facing continual budget shortfalls, one governor even proposed creating a state income tax to cover the skyrocketing costs of the program. (The legislature wisely rejected his proposal.)
It took Democrat Governor Phil Bredesen, in 2005, to roll back TennCare expansion and eliminate eligibility for childless adults—which turned into a boon for the state’s economy. Employment and private insurance coverage increased, Social Security disability applications dropped and the state’s credit rating was upgraded.
Haslam’s plan discourages work and will shrink the economy. As the Congressional Budget Office explains, Medicaid expansion discourages work by creating a massive new welfare cliff. That means the thousands of able-bodied adults Haslam wants to enroll into Medicaid will have no incentive to get a job, work more hours and ultimately get off welfare to support themselves.
Peer-reviewed research on past expansions to able-bodied adults in Arizona, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Utah, Washington, D.C., Wisconsin and even Tennessee found similar results. Based on these past expansions, Tennessee could expect to see as many as 60,000 to 65,000 able-bodied adults drop out of the labor force. Is this the type of pro-growth reform Tennesseans expected when they voted Haslam into office after the Great Recession?
Thousands of children and adults with developmental disabilities in Tennessee are languishing on waiting lists for Medicaid services. But under the new plan, those individuals would be moved to the back of the line to make room for a new class of able-bodied adults.
The expansion covers adults in their prime working years, who have no disabilities keeping them from meaningful employment. The vast majority of them (more than 88 percent) have no dependent children at home. Gov. Haslam acknowledges that nearly half of those who would be made eligible under his plan don’t work at all and President Obama’s own Department of Justice estimates that up to 35 percent of expansion enrollees will have checkered criminal pasts, having served time in prison, jail or on probation.
Seniors, children and individuals with disabilities who already rely on the Medicaid safety net will be forced to compete with this new class of able-bodied adults for appointments with medical providers and for scarce taxpayer resources. Worse yet, Obamacare expansion creates aperverse incentiveto put the most vulnerable on the chopping block first when belt tightening begins.
Then the article comes to this conclusion:
“Gov. Haslam cannot unilaterally expand Medicaid under Obamacare without the legislature’s support. The legislature has already rejected Obamacare expansion before and has wisely prohibited the governor from moving forward on his own.
“They need to keep it up. Instead of wasting time debating how to tweak Haslam’s Obamacare Medicaid expansion, lawmakers should reject expansion outright. Once they do that, they can get down to the serious business of growing the economy, restoring the working class and generating new prosperity throughout the state.
“Medicaid expansion nearly bankrupted Tennessee once before. State lawmakers should make sure Haslam isn’t allowed to do it again.”
Why would Haslam succumb to Obama’s wishes? After an election that saw Republicans opposed to Obamacare gain office – even expanding our supermajority in Tennessee – why would he choose to misread the public’s obvious will?
The media has already begun praising Haslam. The voters need to contact legislators and tell them to stop this disaster immediately.
As I recall, Senator Kelsey was one who worked hard to make a law that meant the governor must get the approval of the legislature before any such expansion. They must stop Haslam.