Losing Faith in the Church of Obama

I came across this shocking exchange today. Why it wasn’t unearthed in 2008, I don’t know. Well, maybe I do know. A slobbering liberal media and a hesitant conservative one didn’t allow it out.

It’s from a James Taranto “Best of the Web” 2004 interview with Cathleen Falsani of the Chicago Sun-Times in which Obama defines sin.

Falsani: Do you believe in sin?

Obama: Yes.

Falsani: What is sin?

Obama: Being out of alignment with my values.

Roger Kimball of PJ Media asks, “Have you ever found a pithier summary of the narcissistic core of today’s ‘progressive’ Left-liberal ideology? I’m not sure I have.”

If you read anything this week, what with the avalanche of crap that will be spilled and passed by the main stream media what with the DNC convention occurring, read a piece by Ed Driscoll called “Let It Go” at PJ Media.

It begins

On Thursday, Jim Geraghty noted that even Mark Halperin of Time has realized how boxed in Mr. Obama is. “Obama can’t win if he can’t swing the conversation away from the economy and render Romney as an out-of-touch plutocrat, an unacceptable alternative in the Oval Office,” Halperin writes. As Geraghty writes in response, “I continue to marvel that we have a presidential campaign unfolding in which one candidate is openly trying to keep the ‘conversation’ away from the topic that is far and away the most important priority to most voters:”

We can play the “what if Republicans did it?” game, and conclude that an incumbent Republican president who sought to avoid discussion of the voters’ top concern would be endlessly, and deservedly, pilloried, denounced, ridiculed, and mocked.

But here’s the simpler and perhaps more reassuring thought: If you have lost voters’ confidence on their top concern, and your entire strategy is to try to get people to stop conversing about it . . . you’re done. You’ve lost. The only way the economy could be eclipsed as voters’ top concern is some other problem coming up — God forbid, some horrific terror attack or natural disaster or something.

Read the rest at http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2012/09/01/let-it-go/

Barry Rubin at PJ Media sums up why the Democrat convention will doom them:

The Republican National Convention, whatever your critique of it, was designed to show that this is not a group of scary, horrible people and that even if it is conservative, this is also a moderate, rational group that proposes conservative solutions and has broad appeal. Of course, the mass media did all it could to distort that fact, but the terrible economic situation of course favors the opposition party.

The information released about the Democratic National Convention seems to show it is designed to prove how radical the party is and to play to the most limited possible sector of the population. There will be hatred and vicious character assassination. Of all the imams that could have been chosen, one with a radical background was picked to lead services while—from what I’ve read—Catholics were almost deliberately dissed. This is a convention featuring Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. There will be a lot of scary people and nasty rhetoric, sort of like a Keith Olbermann film festival. I estimate that two-thirds of the Democrats in Congress are really moderate, though they lack the courage to speak up. But will any of them be allowed to make any moderate statements that truly differ with the far-left line? No. Lots are staying away because they know this to be true; others will smile on the outside and be totally depressed knowing that the iceberg is on the way.

And the more the mass media gushes over this carnival, the more it will discredit itself and increase the cognitive dissonance (a fancy word for: What, are you guys nuts?!) among a lot of Americans. When you are a wolf dressed up in a sheep suit, you don’t want to unzip it, step out, and bare your teeth.

This is typical of a pattern often seen historically in democratic countries around the world, in which a party drifts so far to the left or right, is so dominated by ideologues, and is so arrogant in believing it is the only possible ruling party that it collapses.

I might be wrong, but I think the design of the Democratic National Convention shows why Obama and his congressional supporters are going to lose the election big time.

... Leave a Reply