The Take Around the Blogosphere

So far, conservative bloggers like the Ryan choice for VP.

That Andrea Mitchell and Candy Crowley already have decried it, makes it look all the better. Mitchell called it “not a pick for suburban moms, not a pick for women.” Yes, and you so loved Sarah Palin, didn’t you Andrea? Crowley says the pick “looks a little bit like some sort of ticket death wish.” You mean like Reagan Bush was?

With these two harridans against Ryan, Romney knows he’s onto something.

But at the New Yorker, Ryan Lizza pouts that Ryan “has no significant private sector experience.” You mean like Obama and Biden?

Jim Messina, Obama’s campaign manager, called him a “radical Republican.”

At americanthinker.com, Alan Halbert says thanks.

The last time this term reverberated so loudly through the Capitol and the nation was during the troubled times leading up to the Civil War and during reconstruction after the war (1854 to 1877).

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are on the right side of history when the Democrats are using this “hallowed” term once again. The Republicans gave this nation back its rightful heritage, washed away the sins of slavery, and cleansed the stain against the nations honor by bringing “freedom” to an enslaved people.

On his radio show this morning, Larry Kudlow had nothing but praise for Ryan who worked under Jack Kemp at one time. Others agree.

At legalinsurrection, Professor Jacobs says “the choice of Paul Ryan, and the reaction, finally got me off the donation sideline.”

Redstate’s Erik Erickson sayd it is “not a safe pick…suggests Mitt Romney knows he needs to shift momentum…Paul Ryan works.”

At Blogs for Victory,

Mitt Romney has solidified the conservative credentials of the ticket, and has positioned the conservative movement for the future with the pick of Paul Ryan! And I couldn’t be more pleased. As a seven term congressional representative and Chair of the House Budget Committee, Ryan has proven that he can appeal to the electorate, and win in a very blue state. He also has a unique ability to expose the lunacy of liberal policy, and articulate it in a very common sense manner. Democrats need to be very worried, and this may also prompt Obama to dump Biden, because let’s face it, Ryan is smarter, younger and has more common sense than either one of them on every issue. This is a great pick Mitt, well done.

Talk show host and scholar Hugh Hewitt says:

The theme of “the choice” is a good one, and the promise by both Governor Romney and Representative Ryan of a serious campaign of ideas contrasts very well with the politics of personal destruction coming out of Chicago. Ryan’s youth, energy and obvious command of details and arguments adds a great deal to Romney’s already considerable appeal, and the Badger State just went into the red column, rearranging the map in a stroke. Ryan’s Catholicism is of the serious sort and will also help Governor Romney up and down the line of battleground states.

Ryan is prime time ready and also very ready to be president, a man who came close to running himself and who had a large base of support to do so. Almost every serious journalist in America has had at least one sit-down with Ryan over the past few years, and the links to a few of the transcripts of our lengthy interviews from 2011 and 2012 are below. Congressman Ryan is always prepared, always quick on his feet, and always full of good humor and sincere curiosity…
With Ryan’s selection, Romney has reconnected the Reagan era with the rising generation. Ryan is a Bill Bennett-Jack Kemp protege, and a son of the midwest. It is powerful combo with Mitt Romney, the brilliant son-of-Michigan who was capable of rising in the east and saving a western Olympics.

At PJMedia Roger Kimball says:

I’ve been saying for some time now that Romney will beat Obama by a landslide. His choice of Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan as a running mate makes me even more confident that Romney will trounce Mr. Hope ’n Change. Ryan is an adult. Unlike Joe Biden, he does not regularly give the impression of having suffered a lobotomy. Ryan, unlike the entire Democratic establishment, understands that money does not come from the stork. He understands that individual liberty and limited government go together, and, what’s more, he is in favor of individual liberty, which the Democratic establishment certainly is not. He is energetic, articulate, personable, and mature.

At Breitbart.com the headline is “Game On: Ryan Pick Begins Debate for America.”

At Powerline John Hinderaker says “Romney Doubles down on Competence.”

I admit to some surprise. Presumably Mitt Romney doesn’t think that the Milwaukee suburbs are the key to the White House, or the Eagle Scout demographic will swing the election. So the only explanation is that Romney wants the most competent ticket possible. When was the last time we had a national ticket with this much mathematical skill, or knowledge of finance? Probably never.

So Romney wants to contrast the serious guys who are out to save the country with the buffoonish and dishonest political hacks, Obama and Biden. Well, the contrast is real. But whether the voters will see it that way is another matter. One thing we can be sure of is that Ryan will perform brilliantly on the issues; especially, of course, the budget. Which could be important: Obama’s budgetary fecklessness should be his greatest liability, yet it seems often to be forgotten in more general discussion of the economy. If Ryan helps focus more attention on the budget and the nation’s crushing debt, it will be a plus.

Hot Air’s Erika Johnsen believes that “Paul Ryan is totally ready for his close up.” She gives plenty of samples to back this up. Take a look at: http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/11/videos-paul-ryan-is-totally-ready-for-his-close-up/

Memphis Kid Invited to White House

Ten year old Logan Guleff of Memphis will be the Volunteer State’s representative at the first ever White House Kids’ State Dinner.Logan entered a contest that challenged children to come up with a recipe using the new federal nutritional standards. Logan made a creation he called a “Tuna Schooner” inspired by his Aunt CeCe. Logan’s dad, Tom Guleff, is a conservative from Midtown.

Kernells of Truth

When state representative Mike Kernell, Democrat, was interviewed by Action News 5 last week, he gave an odd account of how he lost his pants.

If you check a few articles below this one, I detailed his narration.

However, when the Commercial Appeal reported the incident on Wednesday, the story seemed to change.

“At about 1:30 in the morning on Friday, Kernell said, his cellphone was acting up, so he walked outside his Sherwood Forest house and sat in his car to finish the call,” writes the CA’s Jody Callahan.

“Suddenly a man ran up.

“I didn’t know what it was, so I tried to drive away. The guy had opened the door and said ‘I’ve got a gun,’ said Kernell, D-Memphis. “At first I didn’t know who it was. As soon as he said gun, well, bullets go faster than cars. I gave up. He pulled me out of the car, pushed me in the yard,” relates Callahan.

That’s a bit different from the version he told Konji Anthony:

Kernell says he was in his driveway when someone came at him from behind. “So I drove out of my driveway and turned the corner but he had already opened the door and said ‘I got a gun’ and with that you just give up.”

Then Anthony says “the suspects grabbed the state rep and threw him out of his car.” “I could not believe it that they had thrown me down on the ground and then they took off my pants,” Kernell said.

Now it seems it was night time. That’s a bit odd. In one story he was driving, in another he was sitting in the car. He says “at first I didn’t know who it was.” Did he recognize the person? Was the thief just walking down the street at an opportune moment and happened to see a chance to rob someone or was he lying in wait or did he stalk Kernell for some reason; a reason that involved taking his pants?

“At that point, Kernell thinks the bad guy was trying to get away as fast as he could. So the thug took Kernell’s phone, his wallet and his pants. Not just any pants, either; they’re handmade dress slacks, since Kernell said he’s hard to fit,” the CA says.

Just when you thought the story couldn’t get any more bizarre, it does. Odd to be wearing handmade dress slacks in your home at 1:30 in the morning. Odd that he wanted to include that bit of information.

In the CA, however, a little is left hanging. It ends with “Kernell then answered the question everyone was probably asking when they heard the news: ‘But I did…’” and then it’s cut off in the print version of the story.

To fill in the blanks for those who are interested, the online story continues: “But I did have an undergarment.”

Ugh.

If this story had involved a Republican, it would have made it to Jay Leno, Stephen Colbert, David Letterman and Jon Stewart.

Lucky for Kernell, his Democrat status had him covered.

What’s Popping With the Kernells?

The other night we were watching Channel 5′s 10 p.m. news when a bizarre story came on about State Representative Mike Kernell.

Kernell, if you’ll recall is the father of …Kernell who in 2008 supposedly hacked Sarah Palin’s website. He was later convicted of some charges concerning that. More on him later.

This time it was Poppa Kernell who was in the limelight. The story opened with Joe Birch headlining that a state rep. was the victim of a violent robbery. Reporter Konji Anthony had the story of “how he fought back” and that Kernell wanted to “equip (his constituents) with information on how to fight crime.”

Kernell says he was in his driveway when someone came at him from behind. “So I drove out of my driveway and turned the corner but he had already opened the door and said ‘I got a gun’ and with that you just give up.”

Then Anthony says “the suspects grabbed the state rep and threw him out of his car.” “I could not believe it that they had thrown me down on the ground and then they took off my pants,” Kernell said.

Wait a minute. This is the part of a show on TV where they make that funny zipping/ripping noise like a needle scratching a record to indicate someone just said or did something startling and unbelievable. Indeed, I am trying to picture this happening myself. He was driving the car, someone approached him and he didn’t drive off? He didn’t have his seat belt on? He didn’t have the doors locked? He didn’t honk the horn? How do you approach someone from behind but get him from the side? I just don’t get it.

But even more bizarre is them taking his pants off? Have I missed some new crime wave pattern? How does this happen and why? Couldn’t he have just handed over his wallet? Did he have his boxers or briefs on? Did they take those, too? What would be the point? Was there a sexual attack? Did they take his money or credit cards? Did any neighbors verify this? It’s outrageous.

Anthony takes it from here. Yes, she really did say, “but he had an ace in his hole.” I don’t want to go there!

Kernell says, “With my new phone I was able to track it with the GPS and find the phone and the person with the phone.”

Is this a commercial? Sounds like one.

At this point they cut to his campaign manager who continued the narrative saying he could track the phone and “did for four days all over Memphis.” Anthony explains how the phone sent a ping into cyberspace which allowed them to follow it. Whaat? And they sat there for four days?

“Kernell did not say where the phone was, eventually located” continues Anthony, “so he won’t interfere with the investigation.” Well, did they find them or not?

Kernell returns to say that the police “are out there ready to take a bullet for us and I think we need to support the police as much as we can.” The campaign managSer adds “his (Kernell’s) whole life is about the people and about working for the community. It’s sad. It breaks my heart.” At this she touches her heart and gets a little teary-eyed.

From what I understand Kernell has made a living out of working for the people. He doesn’t seem to have any other experience in business or finance in the real world the rest of us occupy.

Then yesterday Action News 5 reported on son David Kernell. Again it was Konji Anthony and what looked like the same local as the above story on Daddy Mike for the interview.

“This Independence Day Tennessee state representative Mike Kernell says his son David is now free to pursue the American dream,” Anthony says. “David Kernell was a 20-year-old UT Knoxville student in 2008 when the FBI charged him with hacking the personal Yahoo email account of then vice presidential candidate and Alaska governor Sarah Palin. Four years later David Kernell is completing his four year undergraduate degree at UT. He has switched his major from science to business and wants to be an attorney.”

Mike Kernell says he (his son) recently took his law school admissions tests and “he’s interested in possibly being a criminal defense attorney.” He has two and a half years left of probation. “Kernell says the incident changed his life.”

Yes and it disrupted the Palins, too.

“He went from a college student who was playing games,” continues Kernell, “to maybe someday being a defense attorney.”

In January a federal appeals court panel upheld the conviction and sentence “but Kernell says the case is not over,” according to Anthony. “We fully expect his case will be appealed to the Supreme Court,” Kernell said. It would be against the felony only. The Kernells contend the anticipatory obstruction of justice law was established for financial institutions, not individual people.

Not to mention that people with felonies can’t vote if I recall my civics class. Young David probably wants to follow dad’s path. The Supreme Court seems a bit of a stretch, but given what they did in the last few rulings, hey it could happen. Rules don’t seem to be quite so important nowadays as in those of the founders.

This whole robbery story followed by this son’s story seems bit stretched and suspicious. Could it have anything to do with the upcoming elections? When you can’t play the race cards, the Democrats may have to fall back on the sympathy card.

O Gaffes Overwhelm

President Obama you make it too easy!

I wanted to highlight your gaffe, bungle or outrage of the day, but they are coming so Fast and Furious I can’t keep up.

Take Thursday. You made a rude joke at a gathering hosted by Ellen DeGeneres. Now most of us are not prudes, but we don’t expect the President of the United States, the Commander in Chief, head or our nation and representative among foreign powers to stoop so low. Not only did your sly wink to gays offend your wife, it probably struck gay people as blatant pandering. It’s like the obnoxious classmate who so wants to be your friend that he dogs and flatters you so much it is disturbing. Where’s your dignity?

Yesterday you held a news conference to redirect attention back to you from Scott Walker’s victory and the crescendo of concerns from both parties over security leaks. In the 29 minute pathetic press conference, in which you answered three easy questions from sympathetic reporters, you shot yourself in the foot. “The private sector is doing fine” you declared about the economy. Really? Since when? Are a mere 69,000 jobs created last month (most of which were part time, by the way) indicative of this?

You just handed Republicans a bloody standard to wave repeatedly over the next few months. The Wall St. Journal noted that your statement

“looks primed to play a starring role in this already-fevered campaign season…Within minutes, Republicans including House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio and Sen. Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.), the Senate minority leader, reacted.

Mr. Obama’s Republican presidential challenger, Mitt Romney, called the comment “an extraordinary miscalculation and misunderstanding” by the president. “I think he’s defining what it means to be detached and out of touch with the American people,” Mr. Romney said at a campaign stop in Council Bluffs, Iowa.

Mr. Obama sought to clarify the remarks later in the day, saying “it is absolutely clear that the economy is not doing fine.” He nonetheless again noted the rebound in private-sector job growth and corporate profits to contend that the private sector has “not been the biggest drag on the economy.”

Either way, in an election year likely to be defined by voters’ perceptions of the economy, the damage was done.

Your handlers must be wringing their hands. They can’t let you out there without TOTUS – the teleprompter of the United States. You’re not good at winging it are you? I wonder if you have used a piece in your ear at other times where they could feed you the answers. Better check back on that one.

Mr. Obama is looking less like the president of the United States and more like the preezy of the United Steezy. Or Sleezy. Guess that late night talk show host got it right after all.

Today’s O Outrage

We all know about Michelle’s expensive trips with her daughters to Spain, Hawaii and Colorado. But at National Review Online, Jim Geraghty asks an important question:

Does President Barack Obama know how much he is spending?

Critics of the president asked that question after he asserted, “Since I’ve been president, federal spending has risen at the lowest pace in nearly 60 years.” (This figure comes from an online article that has been widely debunked because, among other sleights of hand, it interprets modest rates of increase in annual spending as a reduction in the spending, even though the total actual spending under Obama’s watch has been gargantuan.)

But the same question could apply to the president’s personal finances as well, given that the president and Mrs. Obama have spent enough money during their time in the White House to reportedly express anxiety about their personal finances — even as the president earns several million dollars from his book sales and even though the taxpayers cover a portion of the Obamas’ living expenses.
In Jodi Kantor’s book about the president’s first three years in office, The Obamas, she describes tensions in the White House before the 2010 midterms:

“Even the president made uncomfortable jokes about why his wife needed so many things. Behind the scenes, aides said, the Obamas were concerned about money: the president’s books could only sell so many copies, and it would be years until he could write more and the first lady could write her own. From vacation rental homes big enough to accommodate the Secret Service to all the personal entertaining they did at the White House, their lifestyle had grown fearsomely expensive.”
David Mendell discussed the Obamas’ surprisingly dicey personal finances in his 2007 biography of the then-senator, Obama: From Promise to Power:

“He and Michelle were living a middle- to upper-middle-class, white collar existence, going home to a spacious town house in Hyde Park and employing a caregiver to help with child care. But despite their combined incomes, which topped $250,000 a year, Obama had personal debt. He had maxed out his credit card, partly on campaign expenses, and the couple were both repaying student loans from Harvard.”

Those campaign expenses came from Obama’s 2000 Democratic-primary bid to unseat Representative Bobby Rush, a four-term incumbent with 90 percent name recognition and a 70 percent approval rating. Obama lost, garnering 30 percent to Rush’s 61 percent. Michelle reportedly thought the campaign was a bad idea, and a new book, Ed Klein’s The Amateur, claims that the stress of the defeat and resulting debt brought the couple to the brink of divorce.

Undoubtedly the 2012 election will focus more on the federal government’s spending under Obama than on the president’s personal spending. But the parallel between the two financial pictures is worth noting. Almost all spendaholics or those who are unable to control their spending engage in a certain amount of denial, an effort to fool themselves about the hard truths of their financial situation. They assure themselves that they must spend money now in order to save more money later, or they count on additional earnings that are unlikely to materialize (say, through rosy assumptions of future economic growth). When confronted with evidence of a serious problem, they assert that it doesn’t really matter (“No matter what some rating agency may say, we have always been, and we will always be, a AAA country”).

In light of all this, “Does Obama know how much he is spending” appears to be an extremely relevant and entirely fair question.

And what does it say about a person who spends other people’s money for his own pleasure? We the taxpayers pay for the elaborate dinners and trips. No wonder Michelle is no longer “ashamed of my country.” We’re footing the bills! While the Obamas decry the 1% taking goods from the 99%, they certainly should include themselves in that 1%. Most decent people would tone down the splendor in light of the suffering of many in this recession/depression.

Even with all this largesse, the Obamas are having a hard time making ends meet. Huh? When is enough enough? Never in their case, I guess.

Shame on Steve Cohen

Ninth district representative Steve Cohen went out and made remarks impugning the Republican held Election Commission over the Memorial Day weekend at a ceremony honoring the fallen. He offers no facts, just accusations. Local news outlets breathlessly repeat his assertions that 500 black Democrats were or will be deprived of their votes. Sounds ominous, huh?

Since it was done on a holiday when Election Commission employees were on vacation, the offices closed and they could not get to the data, the charge was not immediately answered. However, Rich Holden at the Commission today fired back. The Commercial Appeal quotes him as saying “the article from blackboxvoting is incorrect.” (Blackboxvoting.com is an organization run from Seattle by a liberal woman who first suggested fraud.) He backed this up by providing the newspaper with the history for some of the more prominent names on the list.

“We can produce the remaining 400 plus if necessary to prove their handling of data (Blackboxvoting.com), is at best, questionable,” Holden said.

So much for that brouhaha. But it’s a prime example of drive by journalism working with the Democrat party. A Democrat makes an accusation (in this case Rep. Steve Cohen), the news media covers it, the idea gets planted in voters’ heads, but the truth gets buried. It’s a classic set up.

The very people who decry racism and plead for harmony are the first ones to get on this bus. They undermine our electoral system, our democracy and our country.

Cohen owes the residents of Memphis an apology for his rush to condemn us.

Fundraiser for Fincher

Congressman Stephen Fincher (TN-8), new East Memphis Congressional representative, is holding a dutch treat breakfast to meet and converse with him on Wednesday, May 23 at 8 a.m. at the Racquet Club, 5111 Sanderlin. Please RSVP to Kim Kaegi or Mary Brette Clippard at MaryBrette@KaegiResources.com or call 615-513-9823. Limited seating available. $15 per person cash covers breakfast.

Our Council Man Gets It

Midtown has a Democrat as our representative on the Memphis City Council, but he is a Democrat who gets it when it comes to property taxes.

In today’s Commercial Appeal, Strickland pens an op ed entitled “Memphis can’t afford a property tax hike.” How right he is, in both senses of the word. He points out that Memphians pay the highest property taxes in the state. “Our rate is 30 percent higher than Germantown’s, 75 percent higher than Nashville’s, and 235 percent higher than the rate in Somerville in Fayette County.

“The owner of a $150,000 house in Memphis pays $2,703 a year in taxes. If you move about 25 miles east of Cordova to Somerville, you will pay only $806 in taxes for a house of the same value.” And they want to raise it.
Mayor A C Wharton’s proposed budget for the fiscal year that begins in July, which the City Council will review over the next six weeks, would be the largest budget in the history of Memphis if it is passed as the mayor presented it — $628.3 million. It is $22 million higher than the current year’s budget.

“In 2008, over my objections, the council greatly increased city government spending to $616 million. And despite the fact that the administration claims the mayor’s budget proposal includes $24 million in cuts, the amount spent in operating city government has increased. Any money saved with reductions in one part of city government is spent on a program or job in another area of City Hall.

“If the council approves the mayor’s proposed 47-cent one-year increase in the tax rate, Memphis’ tax rate for the coming fiscal year will be 38 percent higher than Germantown’s, 86 percent higher than Nashville’s and 257 percent higher than Somerville’s. For the $150,000 house, the Memphis owner will pay approximately $2,900 compared to an owner in Nashville paying $1,500. Almost twice as much.”

Strickland sees that the end result of all of this is an exodus to Mississippi and our rural environs. We can’t sustain the loss of so many citizens and operate Memphis efficiently.

I can add that I don’t see, ethically, why a home owner should pay for his home once and then, through property taxes, pay for it again. That is a gouging our founding fathers would rail against.

Strickland is taking a very Reagan approach to the issue against his fellow Democrats. I agree with him; “the future of Memphis rests upon our (the council’s) decisions.” If they allow greed or greedy constituents to win the tax fight we will all lose.

Candidate Points Out Cohen Vote

Ninth district Congressional candidate Wilson Stooksberry has been following the votes of our congressman, Steve Cohen. He points out that Cohen wimps out even on non-controversial votes. He writes:

As we have stated throughout our campaign, we believe that this upcoming election will be the most important in any of our lifetime. It will a referendum on standing for the restoring principles that made this country exceptional, or “fundamentally transforming” our country away from those principles.

With that in mind, I believe now, more than ever, it is important to know the principles and values which guide each candidate running for office. On Thursday, April 16, Representative Steve Cohen cast a vote which revealed more insight into his core values and principles.

The vote was Bill HR 3001- The Raoul Wallenberg Centennial Celebration Act

Here is the summary of this bill: To award a Congressional Gold Medal to Raoul Wallenberg, in recognition of his achievements and heroic actions during the Holocaust.

For those that are unaware of the heroic and inspirational story of Raoul Wallenberg, Wallenbeg is widely celebrated for his successful efforts to rescue tens of thousands of Jews from Hungarian Fascists and the Nazis during the later stages of World War II in Nazi-occupied Hungary. While serving as Sweden’s special envoy in Budapest between July and December 1944, Wallenberg issued protective passports and sheltered Jews in buildings designated as Swedish territory, saving thousands from execution.

When presented with the opportunity to vote on the bill honoring and recognizing this heroic figure, Cohen abstained; A clear statement signaling only that he was present to vote, and chose not to vote for the bill’s passage. This is nothing short of a shameful action on the part of Cohen, and his vote needs to be brought to the public’s attention, which is why we are posting it on this site.

I want to applaud each of the other sitting congressmen in the state of TN- both republican and democrat- all of which voted for the bill (The votes of each TN Congressmen are listed below). We stand with you in supporting this bill’s passage.

YEA

R

Roe, Phil

TN 1st

YEA

R

Duncan, John “Jimmy”

TN 2nd

YEA

R

Fleischmann, Chuck

TN 3rd

YEA

R

DesJarlais, Scott

TN 4th

YEA

D

Cooper, Jim

TN 5th

YEA

R

Black, Diane

TN 6th

YEA

R

Blackburn, Marsha

TN 7th

YEA

R

Fincher, Stephen

TN 8th

NO VOTE

D

Cohen, Steve

TN 9th

In a time where political courage and self sacrifice are in short supply, we should all applaud the efforts to honor those that serve as examples and role models for us to follow.

As to why Cohen chose not to stand with the nearly 90% of other Congressmen who voted “yes” to this bill, he has yet to offer any explanation. Some have speculated it has something to do with large amounts of campaign contributions he received from Turkey. The truth is: we simply don’t know. We have asked him via email, and at the time of this writing, we have yet to hear a response.

Stooksberry joins Republicans George Flinn and Charlotte Bergmann as candidates in the primary for Cohen’s seat.